The Longest Queue Drop Policy for Shared-Memory Switches is 1.5-competitive

We consider the Longest Queue Drop memory management policy in shared-memory switches consisting of $N$ output ports. The shared memory of size $M\geq N$ may have an arbitrary number of input ports. Each packet may be admitted by any incoming port, but must be destined to a specific output port and each output port may be used by only one queue. The Longest Queue Drop policy is a natural online strategy used in directing the packet flow in buffering problems. According to this policy and assuming unit packet values and cost of transmission, every incoming packet is accepted, whereas if the shared memory becomes full, one or more packets belonging to the longest queue are preempted, in order to make space for the newly arrived packets. It was proved in 2001 [Hahne et al., SPAA '01] that the Longest Queue Drop policy is 2-competitive and at least $\sqrt{2}$-competitive. It remained an open question whether a (2-\epsilon) upper bound for the competitive ratio of this policy could be shown, for any positive constant \epsilon. We show that the Longest Queue Drop online policy is 1.5-competitive

Approximation algorithms for packing and buffering problems

This thesis studies online and offine approximation algorithms for packing and buffering problems. In the second chapter of this thesis, we study the problem of packing linear programs online. In this problem, the online algorithm may only increase the values of the variables of the linear program and his goal is to maximize the value of the objective function of it. The online algorithm has initially full knowledge of all parameters of the linear program, except for the right-hand sides of the constraints which are gradually revealed to him by the adversary. This online problem has been introduced by Ochel et al. [2012]. Our contribution (Englert et al. [2014]) is to provide improved upper bounds for the competitiveness of both deterministic and randomized online algorithms for this problem, as well as an optimal deterministic online algorithm for the special case of linear programs involving two variables. In the third chapter we study the offine COLORFUL BIN PACKING problem. This problem is a variant of the BIN PACKING problem, where each item is associated with a color and where there exists the additional restriction that two items packed consecutively into the same bin cannot share the same color. The COLORFUL BIN PACKING problem has been studied mainly from an online perspective and has been introduced as a generalization of the BLACK AND WHITE BIN PACKING problem (Balogh et al. [2012]), i.e., the special case of this problem for two colors. We provide (joint work with Matthias Englert) a 2-appoximate algorithm for the COLORFUL BIN PACKING problem. In the fourth chapter we study the Longest Queue Drop (LQD) online algorithm for shared-memory switches with three and two output ports. The Longest Queue Drop algorithm is a well-known online algorithm used to direct the packet ow of shared-memory switches. According to LQD, when the buffer of the switch becomes full, a packet is preempted from the longest queue in the buffer to free buffer space for the newly arriving packet which is accepted. We show (Matsakis [2016], to appear) that the Longest Queue Drop algorithm is (3/2)-competitive for three-port switches, improving the previously best upper bound of 5/3 (Kobayashi et al. [2007]). Additionally, we show that this algorithm is exactly (4/3)-competitive for two-port switches, correcting a previously published result claiming a tight upper bound of 4M-4/3M-2 < 4=3, where M 2 Z+ denotes the buffer size

Breaking the Barrier Of 2 for the Competitiveness of Longest Queue Drop

We consider the problem of managing the buffer of a shared-memory switch that transmits packets of unit value. A shared-memory switch consists of an input port, a number of output ports, and a buffer with a specific capacity. In each time step, an arbitrary number of packets arrive at the input port, each packet designated for one output port. Each packet is added to the queue of the respective output port. If the total number of packets exceeds the capacity of the buffer, some packets have to be irrevocably rejected. At the end of each time step, each output port transmits a packet in its queue and the goal is to maximize the number of transmitted packets. The Longest Queue Drop (LQD) online algorithm accepts any arriving packet to the buffer. However, if this results in the buffer exceeding its memory capacity, then LQD drops a packet from the back of whichever queue is currently the longest, breaking ties arbitrarily. The LQD algorithm was first introduced in 1991, and is known to be 2-competitive since 2001. Although LQD remains the best known online algorithm for the problem and is of practical interest, determining its true competitiveness is a long-standing open problem. We show that LQD is 1.707-competitive, establishing the first (2-?) upper bound for the competitive ratio of LQD, for a constant ? > 0

Improved approximation guarantees for shortest superstrings using cycle classification by overlap to length ratios

In the Shortest Superstring problem, we are given a set of strings and we are asking for a common superstring, which has the minimum number of characters. The Shortest Superstring problem is NP-hard and several constant-factor approximation algorithms are known for it. Of particular interest is the GREEDY algorithm, which repeatedly merges two strings of maximum overlap until a single string remains. The GREEDY algorithm, being simpler than other well-performing approximation algorithms for this problem, has attracted attention since the 1980s and is commonly used in practical applications. Tarhio and Ukkonen (TCS 1988) conjectured that GREEDY gives a 2-approximation. In a seminal work, Blum, Jiang, Li, Tromp, and Yannakakis (STOC 1991) proved that the superstring computed by GREEDY is a 4-approximation, and this upper bound was improved to 3.5 by Kaplan and Shafrir (IPL 2005). We show that the approximation guarantee of GREEDY is at most $(13+\sqrt{57})/6 \approx 3.425$, making the first progress on this question since 2005. Furthermore, we prove that the Shortest Superstring can be approximated within a factor of $(37+\sqrt{57})/18\approx 2.475$, improving slightly upon the currently best $2\frac{11}{23}$-approximation algorithm by Mucha (SODA 2013)

Breaking the barrier of 2 for the competitiveness of longest queue drop

We consider the problem of managing the buffer of a shared-memory switch that transmits packets of unit value. A shared-memory switch consists of an input port, a number of output ports, and a buffer with a specific capacity. In each time step, an arbitrary number of packets arrive at the input port, each packet designated for one output port. Each packet is added to the queue of the respective output port. If the total number of packets exceeds the capacity of the buffer, some packets have to be irrevocably rejected. At the end of each time step, each output port transmits a packet in its queue and the goal is to maximize the number of transmitted packets. The Longest Queue Drop (LQD) online algorithm accepts any arriving packet to the buffer. However, if this results in the buffer exceeding its memory capacity, then LQD drops a packet from the back of whichever queue is currently the longest, breaking ties arbitrarily. The LQD algorithm was first introduced in 1991, and is known to be 2-competitive since 2001. Although LQD remains the best known online algorithm for the problem and is of practical interest, determining its true competitiveness is a long-standing open problem. We show that LQD is 1.707-competitive, establishing the first (2-ε) upper bound for the competitive ratio of LQD, for a constant ε > 0

New bounds for online packing LPs

Solving linear programs online has been an active area of research in recent years and was used with great success to develop new online algorithms for a variety of problems. We study the setting introduced by Ochel et al. as an abstraction of lifetime optimization of wireless sensor networks. In this setting, the online algorithm is given a packing LP and has to monotonically increase LP variables in order to maximize the objective function. However, at any point in time, the adversary only provides an α-approximation of the remaining slack for each constraint. This is designed to model scenarios in which only estimates of remaining capacities (e.g. of batteries) are known, and they get more and more accurate as the remaining capacities approach 0. Ochel et al. (ICALP'12) gave a Θ(ln α/α)-competitive online algorithm for this online packing LP problem and showed an upper bound on the competitive ratio of any online algorithm, even randomized, of Ο(1/√α). We significantly improve the upper bound and show that any deterministic online algorithm for LPs with δ variables is at most O(δ2 α1/m/δ/α)-competitive. For randomized online algorithms we show an upper bound of O(m2 α 1/m/α) for LPs with mm!ln α variables. For LPs with sufficiently many variables, these bounds are O(ln2 α/α), nearly matching the known lower bound. On the other hand, we also show that the known lower bound can be significantly improved if the number of variables in the LP is small. Specifically, we give a deterministic Θ(1/√α)-competitive online algorithm for packing LPs with two variables. This is tight, since the previously known upper bound of O(1/√α) still holds for 2-dimensional LPs

LQD is 1.5-competitive for 3-port Shared-Memory Switches

Abstract. We show that the Longest Queue Drop algorithm is 1.5-competitive for shared-memory switches with three output ports. This improves upon the previous best upper bound of (2− for the competitive ratio of the Longest Queue Drop algorithm, for 3-port shared-memory switches, where M denotes the shared-memory size